Contribute
Submission Guidelines
Standards for academic rigor, cultural authenticity, and editorial quality.
Editorial Philosophy
The Sufi Science Center maintains rigorous editorial standards to ensure all published content meets criteria for academic integrity, cultural sensitivity, and intellectual depth. We seek contributions that advance understanding at the intersection of science and spirituality while respecting the integrity of both domains.
Our editorial process balances scholarly rigor with accessibility, ensuring content is both academically sound and publicly engaging. We value clarity, precision, and the courage to explore complex questions without resorting to oversimplification.
General Requirements
Original Content
Submissions must be original work not previously published elsewhere. Proper citation is required for all referenced material.
Clear Language
Write clearly for educated non-specialist audiences. Define technical terms, avoid unnecessary jargon, and explain complex concepts accessibly.
Cultural Authenticity
Represent spiritual traditions accurately and respectfully. Cite authoritative sources and acknowledge cultural context.
Evidence-Based
Support claims with evidence, whether empirical research, textual analysis, or documented contemplative experience. Distinguish fact from interpretation.
Format and Style
Research Papers
- •Abstract (150-300 words)
- •Main content (3,000-8,000 words)
- •References in APA, MLA, or Chicago style
- •Supplementary materials (optional)
Articles and Essays
- •Length: 1,500-4,000 words
- •Engaging opening that frames the inquiry
- •Clear argument or narrative structure
- •Key sources cited appropriately
Sacred Texts and Poetry
- •Original text with proper attribution
- •Translation (if applicable) with translator credits
- •Commentary explaining context, themes, and significance
- •Cultural and historical background
Review Process
1. Initial Review (1-2 weeks)
Editorial team assesses submission for alignment with mission, quality standards, and completeness.
2. Peer Review (2-4 weeks)
Qualified reviewers evaluate content for accuracy, rigor, and contribution to the field. Feedback provided for revisions if needed.
3. Editorial Decision
Final decision: accept, request revision, or decline. All submitters receive detailed feedback regardless of outcome.
4. Publication
Approved content is edited for style, formatted for web, and published in the appropriate knowledge module with full attribution.
What We Cannot Accept
•Plagiarized or non-original content
•Content promoting pseudoscience or making unfounded claims
•Material that misrepresents or appropriates spiritual traditions
•Promotional content or commercial advertising
•Content violating copyright or intellectual property rights